<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Things-Your-Supervisor-Should-Know on Yet another blog restart</title>
    <link>https://pseyfert.codeberg.page/tags/things-your-supervisor-should-know/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Things-Your-Supervisor-Should-Know on Yet another blog restart</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 20:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://pseyfert.codeberg.page/tags/things-your-supervisor-should-know/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Heisenberg&#39;s uncertainty not so relevant after all?</title>
      <link>https://pseyfert.codeberg.page/2016/01/heisenbergs-uncertainty-not-so-relevant-after-all/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 20:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <guid>https://pseyfert.codeberg.page/2016/01/heisenbergs-uncertainty-not-so-relevant-after-all/</guid>
      <description>Discussing design aspects of particle physics detectors, one might hit a point where one seems to have a tradeoff between spatial resolution and momentum resolution. Discussing this with generic particle physics theorists, one hears that this is not worth mentioning as clearly when measuring individual particles, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle plays a role. But does it?</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
